SUBSCRIBER-ONLY ARTICLE
Paul White replys to the AWRI
Before getting into a detailed discussion of the issues at hand, I’d like to address AWRI’s complaint that Harper’s and Scientifically Speaking have not rigidly followed academic scientific standards. Harper’s is obviously not a peer reviewed scientific journal. It’s a magazine focused on the wine trade and interested consumers. Given that audience, its primary task is to translate complex issues in a way that makes sense to its readers so they can make informed, rational decisions about wine related issues. Dressing Scientifically Speaking with snappy titles and headings goes a long way towards engaging readers’ attention, not to mention keeping them from dozing off mid-paragraph. AWRI appear to have misunderstood the point of this and seem to have been a touch overly sensitive concerning choice of titles and section headings. ...
This article is only available to subscribers to Harpers. Subscribers have access to the complete archive of Harpers online, going back to 2002, as well as full access to the Harpers Wine and Spirit Directory. As a subscriber, you would also be able to take advantage of the new keyword alerts service.
|
